Skip to content

refactor: prefer backend over gt4py_backend on quantities #109

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
fmalatino merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2026
Merged

refactor: prefer backend over gt4py_backend on quantities #109

fmalatino merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2026

Conversation

@romanc
Copy link
Collaborator

@romanc romanc commented Jan 6, 2026

Description

On Quantities, we have currently allow both backend and gt4py_backend where the later is deprecated and about to be removed.

See NOAA-GFDL/NDSL#312 and NOAA-GFDL/NDSL#314 for context.

/cc @FlorianDeconinck

How Has This Been Tested?

Search and manual replace of gt4py_backend with just backend. CI is still green.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas: N/A
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation: N/A
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • New check tests, if applicable, are included: N/A
  • Targeted model if this changed was triggered by a model need/shortcoming: N/A

@romanc
refactor: prefer backend over gt4py_backend
594739f 
On `Quantities`, we have currently allow both `backend` and
`gt4py_backend` where the later is deprecated and about to be removed.
See NOAA-GFDL/NDSL#312 and
NOAA-GFDL/NDSL#314 for context.
@romanc romanc requested review from fmalatino and oelbert January 6, 2026 13:41
@romanc romanc changed the title refactor: prefer backend over gt4py_backend refactor: prefer backend over gt4py_backend on quantities Jan 6, 2026
@romanc romanc mentioned this pull request Jan 8, 2026
Closed
8 tasks
@romanc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

romanc commented Jan 13, 2026

Someone else needs to merge on my behalf, I don't have permission to do so.

@fmalatino fmalatino added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 13, 2026
Merged via the queue into NOAA-GFDL:develop with commit 3788a13 Jan 13, 2026
5 checks passed
@romanc romanc deleted the romanc/quantity-backend-update branch January 13, 2026 17:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@oelbert oelbert oelbert approved these changes

@fmalatino fmalatino fmalatino approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@romanc @oelbert @fmalatino